# Three Crypto Coins Getting Ready to Explode

Crypto picks from Altcoin Daily: Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol, with the bull case, key catalysts, risks and what viewers push back on.

Source: https://g1ftw4v3x5.top/three-crypto-coins-getting/ · based on the channel [Altcoin Daily](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbLhGKVY-bJPcawebgtNfbw) · Video: [These 3 Crypto Coins Are Getting Ready To EXPLODE!?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reNe1hqrzMs) · 2026-10-23

![Three Crypto Coins Getting Ready to Explode](https://g1ftw4v3x5.top/three-crypto-coins-getting/three-crypto-coins-getting.webp)

## Key takeaways

- Altcoin Daily highlights Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol as the three coins with the strongest setup.
- Solana is framed as the leading high-throughput Layer 1 with the deepest retail and developer activity.
- Hyperliquid pairs a perpetuals exchange with its own L1 and HYPE token, tying revenue to token demand.
- Near Protocol is pitched as the hot momentum play, with viewers citing a $15 target for this cycle.
- Viewer sentiment is split: some back TAO, Midnight and Zcash over the video's picks, and 'Uptober' doubts persist.

Crypto markets reward attention, and the three coins getting the most attention in Altcoin Daily's latest breakdown are Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol. The channel argues that each combines real usage with a token that captures value from that usage, which is why they sit at the top of its watchlist rather than the long tail of low-liquidity alts. For daily market commentary and follow-up picks, the channel points readers to its [Altcoin Daily X account](https://twitter.com/AltcoinDaily).

## What the crypto picks have in common

The common thread is revenue or activity that flows back to the token rather than pure narrative. Solana processes one of the highest volumes of on-chain transactions among Layer 1 networks and hosts a dense ecosystem of DeFi, payments and consumer apps. Hyperliquid runs a perpetual futures exchange where trading fees accrue to a protocol with its own Layer 1 and HYPE token. Near Protocol sits in the same bucket through its focus on fast finality, sharded scaling and consumer-facing apps. All three are liquid enough for large positions, which matters when the goal is catching an explosive move rather than chasing micro-caps.

## Solana as the leading high-throughput Layer 1

Solana's case rests on throughput, cost and developer gravity. The network's design lets it handle high transaction volumes at low fees, which is why it has become the default home for retail trading apps, memecoin launches and payments experiments. That activity feeds demand for SOL through fees, staking and as collateral across lending markets. The main risk is history: the network has suffered outages in earlier cycles, and congestion during demand spikes remains a recurring criticism. The bull argument is that Solana is the only alternative Layer 1 that has repeatedly rebuilt its ecosystem after a drawdown, and that its consumer app pipeline is deeper than any rival's.

## Hyperliquid and the exchange-token model

Hyperliquid is the most structurally different of the three. It is a decentralized perpetuals exchange built on its own Layer 1, so trading activity, order books and settlement all live in one system rather than being split across a general-purpose chain. Fees generated by traders support the HYPE token, which makes the asset closer to an equity-like claim on exchange volume than a pure governance token. The trade-off is concentration: revenue depends on derivatives volume, and derivatives volume is cyclical. When leverage appetite falls, so does the fee stream. Viewers also raise a practical point about costs, noting that some competing chains are cheaper for gas in day-to-day use, though that comparison matters less for traders who never leave the exchange.

## Near Protocol and the momentum narrative

Near Protocol is the pick most tied to momentum rather than fundamentals alone. The network emphasizes usability, fast confirmation times and sharded scaling, and it has pushed into consumer and AI-adjacent applications. In the video's framing, Near is the coin with the most room to re-rate if capital rotates from large caps into mid-caps. That is also where the risk sits: a re-rating depends on flows, and flows can reverse quickly. Community discussion reflects the split, with some traders arguing Near could reach $15 this cycle while others prefer privacy coins such as Zcash on the same thesis. Treat any price target as a scenario, not a forecast.

## Questions and doubts from the crypto community

Viewer reaction shows where the consensus breaks down. Several traders back Bittensor (TAO) as the stronger AI narrative, while others name Midnight, Plume and Grass as their preferred small-cap bets. Solana draws the most consistent support, with many calling it their number-one or number-two holding and pointing to its wallet and consumer app ecosystem. The most common scepticism is seasonal: repeated disappointment with the so-called "Uptober" rally has left traders wary of calendar-based optimism. A recurring practical question is whether to hold older picks such as Concordium, which shows that narrative rotation is as important as the original thesis. The takeaway is not that the video's three picks are wrong, but that position sizing and entry timing matter as much as the coin selection.

## How to act on a three-coin crypto watchlist

A watchlist is only useful if it comes with rules. A workable process looks like this:

1. Size positions by liquidity, not conviction: Solana, Hyperliquid and Near all trade deeply, so a 1-3% portfolio allocation per name keeps risk manageable.
2. Track the metric that drives each token: on-chain activity and staking for SOL, perpetuals volume and fees for HYPE, developer and app growth for NEAR.
3. Set invalidation levels before entry, so a thesis break triggers an exit rather than a hope.
4. Avoid chasing vertical candles; explosive moves in liquid alts often retrace 20-30% before continuing.
5. Re-check the thesis each quarter, because narratives rotate faster than fundamentals.

## Links from the video

- [Altcoin Daily on X](https://twitter.com/AltcoinDaily) — daily market commentary and follow-up picks.
- [WEEX welcome event](https://www.weex.com/events/welcome-event?vipCode=oz5p&qrType=activity) — 50% deposit bonus on a first $100 deposit, promoted by the channel.

## Bottom line on the three crypto coins

Altcoin Daily's breakdown lands on Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol for three different reasons: scale, cash flow and momentum. Solana carries the strongest ecosystem case, Hyperliquid offers the cleanest link between trading fees and token value, and Near is the highest-variance bet on a mid-cap rotation. The channel's own framing is that these are setups, not guarantees, and the viewer debate around TAO, Midnight and Zcash shows how quickly the leaderboard can change. Anyone acting on the list should verify the catalysts independently and follow the channel on [X](https://twitter.com/AltcoinDaily) for the next update.

## Questions & answers

**Why does Altcoin Daily pick Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol?**

The channel groups them by different strengths: Solana for throughput and developer activity, Hyperliquid for fee revenue tied to its HYPE token, and Near for momentum and a potential mid-cap re-rating. Each is liquid enough for meaningful position sizes, which is not true of most small-cap alts.

**Is Hyperliquid cheaper than other chains for gas?**

Not necessarily for everyday on-chain activity, and traders in the comments point out that some competing networks cost less per transaction. Hyperliquid's advantage is that trading, settlement and the order book live on one Layer 1, so active derivatives traders rarely need to bridge elsewhere. Cost comparisons depend on whether you are trading or just moving funds.

**Can Near Protocol reach $15 this cycle?**

Some traders in the community float $15 as a target, but that is a scenario rather than a forecast. It would require sustained capital rotation from large caps into mid-caps plus continued growth in Near's app ecosystem. Position sizing should assume the target can fail.

**Should I hold older picks like Concordium instead of these three?**

There is no rule that a newer narrative replaces an older one, but capital tends to follow attention. If a holding no longer has a clear catalyst or growing usage, it is worth reviewing against names with active developer and volume trends. Diversifying across narratives rather than concentrating in one is the safer approach.